Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Majeski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Majeski

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Las Vegas Review-Journal, Miami New Times, KT Network is paid/sponsored coverage. Fails WP:GNG. US-Verified (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - so many low-quality references -- do 10 ten-percent refs add up to one good 100% ref?? I spent a lot of time looking at them and looking for more.

I am familiar with the local Princeton, NJ publications. They are reliable but so very locally-focused that I hesitate to consider them.

This person is working hard to become famous for being famous and has almost made it.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Television, Internet, and New Jersey. Skynxnex (talk) 05:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent & reliable sources in article (all coverage is paid or interviews or both), no luck on google. Beyond notes in nom, note that SFGate link is also labeled sponsored and attributed to "Ascend Media". —siro χ o 07:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.